Open recovery benchmark
Openable competitor analysis
A format-by-format comparison of Openable and browser repair tools on frozen PDF, JPEG, and PNG cases.
Verified recovery
A pass means the recovered file matches the untouched source under the frozen validator, while healthy controls remain unchanged.
6 damaged · 3 healthy controls
JPEG
6 damaged · 3 healthy controls
PNG
6 damaged · 3 healthy controls
Openable led the registered PDF and PNG cohorts and tied ToolTea on JPEG. The broader product distinction is coverage: Openable provides one local browser workflow across all three tested formats; the PDF products are PDF-only, while ToolTea is image-only.
Consumer experience
| Product | Formats tested | Processing | Install | Account / paid export | Observed limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Openable | PDF, JPEG, PNG | Local browser | None | None | None |
| PDF24 | Server upload | None | None | None observed | |
| zPDF | Local browser | None | None | 10 files per session | |
| PDF2Go | Server upload | None | None for this run | 8 anonymous credits; 3 files per free task | |
| ToolTea | JPEG, PNG | Local browser | None | None | Single-file workflow |
Competitor criteria
Audit the result
The combined evidence report contains every tested product and format, including the frozen plans, tool identities, all 72 case results, independent validation checks, SHA-256 inventories, and publication attestations.
Registration, protocol, corpora, tools, results, and full competitor analysis on GitHub